List of sheets SD-2026-D
SD-2026-D
Checking design documentation and the design brief
General data.
Stage
Sheet
Sheets
IFC
1
6
Telegram Email Call
Revision
Checked · date
Drawing No.
Package contents
Design volumes 13 volumes
Explanatory note Site plan Architecture Structures ! Electrical Water supply Ventilation Communications Construction organisation Fire safety Accessibility missing Energy efficiency ! Estimate
Input data
You upload The design package in PDF
You get Which sections and sheets are missing Check the contents 0 present0 incomplete0 missing
We will check your design package
Send the sections — we will show what is missing.
Upload the design Call me back
Telegram Email Call Sheet 2
SD-2026-D
Contents
Revision
Checked · date
Drawing No.
Code compliance remarks
1 2 3 4 A B C 18000 6000 6000 6000 6000 4800 700 as required 1000 air duct P1 Stair 1.2 Office 31.9 m² 1.3 Office 31.9 m² 1.4 Corridor 46.4 m² 1 1 1 2 3 beam B1 air duct P1 600×400 1.4 Corridor 2.4 Corridor 1900 +7.200 +6.600 +3.300 ±0.000 detail 1 · S-11 2 3 4 6000 6000 4 5
Plan · A-5
Section · A-8
Input data
You upload Design sections in PDF
You get Remarks with the code clause 0 code remarks
Check against codes 1 Door 0.7 m, but an escape route needs at least 0.8 m Fire code, cl. 4.2.5 ? 2 Stair 1.0 m, but at least 1.05 m is needed Fire code, cl. 4.4.1 ? 3 The entrance door opens inwards, but must open outwards Fire code, cl. 4.2.6 ? 4 Clearance under the duct is 1.9 m, but at least 2 m is needed Fire code, cl. 4.3.2 ? 5 Reinforcement 25 mm from the slab bottom, but at least 40 mm is needed Concrete code, cl. 10.3.2 ?
We will find such remarks in your design
With the sheet and the code clause — before the plan review.
Upload the design Call me back
Revision
Checked · date
Drawing No.
Clashes between sections
Architecture · A-5 Ventilation · M-3
2 3 4 A B C 1.2 Office 1.3 Office 1.4 Corridor ceiling +2.700 server room duct bottom +1.900 1 2 3
Input data
You upload All design sections
You get Places where sections do not match 0 clashes between sections
Compare the sections 1 In architecture the wall is solid, yet a duct runs through it sheets A-5 and M-3, grid line 3 ? 2 In architecture it is an office, in ventilation it is a server room sheets A-5 and M-3 ? 3 The duct hangs below the suspended ceiling sheets A-5 and M-3 ?
We will compare the sections of your design
We will show where the sections do not match.
Upload the design Call me back
Telegram Email Call Sheet 4
SD-2026-D
Sections
Revision
Checked · date
Drawing No.
Plan review comments
Version 2 · 161 sheets changed: —
№ 3 Door narrower than 0.8 mA-5 · FP-14 resolved № 7 Basement air exchangeM-5 resolved № 9 Slab reinforcement closer than 40 mmS-11 not resolved № 12 Heat demand for ventilationEN-4 · M-7 not resolved
Input data
You upload Plan review comments and the corrected design
You get Replies and a check of the corrections Check the corrections 2 corrected · 2 remain, no reply is sent for them
We will prepare responses to plan review comments
We will check that the corrections have been made.
Upload files Call me back
Telegram Email Call Sheet 5
SD-2026-D
Plan review
Revision
Checked · date
Drawing No.
Telegram Email Call Sheet 6
SD-2026-D
Design check
Revision
Checked · date
Drawing No.
Number received We will call you back.
Section missing
Measures to ensure access for people with disabilities
Is it required Yes: for a public building the section is mandatory On the drawings Entrance via a three-step porch, no ramp Where it is stated Design contract, list of sections The section must be developed before submission for plan review.
Check my design Volume “Structures” →
Section incomplete
Structural solutions
text with calculations drawings · 28 sheets
What is wrong The drawings are there, the text part with calculations is not Where it is stated Design contract, section requirements Add the structural calculations to the volume.
Check my design Volume “Energy efficiency” →
Section incomplete
Energy efficiency measures
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
What is wrong The contents list 9 sheets, the file has 6: sheets 7, 8 and 9 are missing Where it is stated volume contents Add the missing sheets or correct the contents.
Check my design
Door from office 1.2
Fire safety · sheet A-5
in the design 700 mm
by the code, at least 800 mm 100 mm short
Code Clear width of an escape exit — at least 0.8 m Where it is stated Fire code, cl. 4.2.5 Correct sheet A-5 or reject the remark with an explanation. The specialist decides.
Check my design Remark 2 →
Stair width
Fire safety · sheet A-5
in the design 1000 mm
by the code, at least 1050 mm 50 mm short
Code Flight width for this building — at least 1.05 m Where it is stated Fire code, cl. 4.4.1 Widen the stair on sheets A-5 and A-9. The specialist decides.
Check my design Remark 3 →
Entrance door
Fire safety · sheet A-5
street building in the design: inwards street building by the code: outwards Code Doors on escape routes open outwards Where it is stated Fire code, cl. 4.2.6 Change the opening direction on sheet A-5. The specialist decides.
Check my design Remark 4 →
Clearance under the duct
Fire safety · section A-8
in the design 1900 mm
by the code, at least 2000 mm 100 mm short
Code Escape route height — at least 2 m Where it is stated Fire code, cl. 4.3.2 Raise the duct above the beam or route it differently. The specialist decides.
Check my design Remark 5 →
Foundation slab detail
Structures · detail on sheet S-11
25 40 design code Detail 1 · sheet S-11 · fragment Code From the slab bottom to the reinforcement — at least 40 mm Where it is stated Concrete code, cl. 10.3.2 Correct detail 1 on sheet S-11. The specialist decides.
Check my design
Wall between the offices
one place on two sheets
2 3 4 A B C 1.2 Office 1.3 Office 1.4 Corridor ceiling +2.700 server room duct bottom +1.900 Architecture · A-5 2 3 4 A B C 1.2 Office 1.3 Office 1.4 Corridor ceiling +2.700 server room duct bottom +1.900 Ventilation · M-3 Architecture says Solid wall, 250 mm, no opening Ventilation says A duct to office 1.3 passes through the wall Which sheet is right is decided by the specialists of both sections.
Check my design Clash 2 →
Room 1.3
one place on two sheets
2 3 4 A B C 1.2 Office 1.3 Office 1.4 Corridor ceiling +2.700 server room duct bottom +1.900 Architecture · A-5 2 3 4 A B C 1.2 Office 1.3 Office 1.4 Corridor ceiling +2.700 server room duct bottom +1.900 Ventilation · M-3 Architecture says Room 1.3 — office Ventilation says Room 1.3 — server room with air conditioning Which sheet is right is decided by the specialists of both sections.
Check my design Clash 3 →
Corridor 1.4
one place on two sheets
2 3 4 A B C 1.2 Office 1.3 Office 1.4 Corridor ceiling +2.700 server room duct bottom +1.900 Architecture · A-5 2 3 4 A B C 1.2 Office 1.3 Office 1.4 Corridor ceiling +2.700 server room duct bottom +1.900 Ventilation · M-3 Architecture says Suspended ceiling at 2.7 m Ventilation says Duct bottom at 1.9 m Which sheet is right is decided by the specialists of both sections.
Check my design
Door width less than 0.8 m
plan review comment No. 3
resolved
Where in the design Sheets A-5 and FP-14 Where it is stated Fire code, cl. 4.2.5 Draft reply “The door width is increased to 0.9 m, sheets A-5 and FP-14 are changed” New version Both sheets changed, door 0.9 m The correction is made on all sheets of the response. The reviewer gives the final sign-off.
Check my design Remark No. 7 →
Basement air exchange not justified
plan review comment No. 7
resolved
Where in the design Sheet M-5, air exchange table Where it is stated table 2 on sheet M-5 Draft reply “The basement calculation is added to table 3 on sheet M-5” New version Table 3 is there, the basement is calculated The correction is made on all sheets of the response. The reviewer gives the final sign-off.
Check my design Remark No. 9 →
Slab reinforcement closer than 40 mm to the bottom
plan review comment No. 9
not resolved
Where in the design Sheet S-11, detail 1 Where it is stated Concrete code, cl. 10.3.2 Draft reply “The distance to the reinforcement is increased to 40 mm” New version The sheet is changed, but detail 1 still shows 35 mm The correction is not made: no response is sent yet. The reviewer gives the final sign-off.
Check my design Remark No. 12 →
Heat demand for ventilation not recalculated
plan review comment No. 12
not resolved
Where in the design Sheet EN-4, linked to sheet M-7 Where it is stated sheet M-7: the unit was replaced Draft reply “The heat demand is recalculated on sheet EN-4” New version Sheet EN-4 did not change in the new version The correction is not made: no response is sent yet. The reviewer gives the final sign-off.
Check my design
